<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Melanoma Research Foundation | Jw2457 | Activity</title>
	<link>https://forum.melanoma.org/user/jw2457/activity/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://forum.melanoma.org/user/jw2457/activity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed for Jw2457.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:49:13 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=</generator>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">b475cca3ff15f5e60034b1ef34d06a8e</guid>
				<title>Jw2457 replied to the topic Confirmed by 2nd Path, it is Melanoma in the forum User</title>
				<link>https://forum.melanoma.org/forums/topic/confirmed-by-2nd-path-it-is-melanoma/#post-273704</link>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2020 04:41:00 -0500</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there just wanted to pop back in and follow up. I had my WLE and SLNB on 11/30. They were able to get clear margins and removed about 10 lymph nodes, all came back negative. What was left in what was excised was just residual melanoma in-situ, so it seems like the originals biopsy on diagnosis got most of it out at .9mm, but with regression&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-440"><a href="https://forum.melanoma.org/forums/topic/confirmed-by-2nd-path-it-is-melanoma/#post-273704" rel="nofollow ugc">Read more</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>